|
Looks like we’re in the era now of CAN-SPAM and we’re going to have to
deal with it. The law may not be all that effective (see the clip I have
below from BusinessWeek on how spammers are laughing it off) but within the
trade many marketers and list managers/brokers are very concerned. I’ve
heard through the grapevine that big time e-mailers are not scheduling third
party mailings for months to come.
The e-mail marketing world is in a quandary. Some might say it’s a seller’s
market now with all this lightening up of legitimate permission e-mail.
Top
Because of all this fear and confusion about using e-mail as a prospecting
tool many marketers are turning to co-registration techniques to garner new
names. (Co-registration, for those who might be new to this term, occurs
when a user goes to a site and registers and is shown other offers that he
or she can opt-in for by simply checking a box.)
The "heat" is off as far as the front line of name collection is
concerned with co-reg but returns when marketers mail to these lists.
Marketers still need to be cautious when mailing to co-reg names. Many
online users suffer a lot of amnesia when it comes to remembering what they
signed up for and will hit the "Report Spam" button on AOL. That
can turn out to be problematic if large numbers on AOL complain about any
one marketer. It’s an art more than a science learning how to mail to
names you gather from the Web but well worth mastering because it’s a list
you’ll own forever.
In the meantime, look over these next findings to see if you are doing
things right:
Top
A recent survey conducted by Marketingprofs.com reveals the
results from over
2,800 e-mail marketers. An interesting profile emerged:
 |
76% devote 10% or less to email marketing of their e-letters |
 |
21% believe that they will spend significantly more on e-mail marketing in
2004 |
 |
77% expect an increase in revenue from email marketing |
 |
60% send out e-letters with original content |
For more stats on what others are doing to benchmark yourself against click
on
http://www.marketingprofs.com/benchmark/surveyasp/emailreport.asp
Top
The biggest change over the last three years, according to a new Harris Poll
is "that among the (now much larger) online population, the
frequency of email use has declined somewhat while those using the Internet
for many other purposes have increased."
Biggest changes in the last three years
The number of people who are online has increased over the last three years
from 63% in 2000 to 69% by December 2003. Here’s a quick look at the
activities that show the biggest increases of online adults who are doing
each of the following "very often" or "often":
 |
Gathering information about products and services: up from 25% to 41% |
 |
Doing research for work or school: up from 37% to 45% |
 |
Surfing the web to explore new and different sites: up from 24% to 32% |
 |
Obtaining information on local amusements and activities: up from 11% to 19% |
 |
Downloading or playing games: up from 13% to 18% |
 |
Making travel plans and arrangements: up from 11% to 15%. |
To see the rest of the findings in-depth click on http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=433
Top
More backlash against the CAN-SPAM Act. Business Week's Stephen Wildstrom
contrasts the CAN-SPAM Act to the FTC's Do Not Call list. While the Do Not
Call list was successful almost immediately, spammers appear to be ignoring
the CAN-SPAM Act. Wildstrom notes that the law was rushed and does not
provide funding for enforcement, whereas the Do Not Call list was phased in
over several months and much easier to enforce. (Corante 01/08/04)
http://www.corante.com/policy/redir/36520.html
Top
Apparently, even the marketing industry is unhappy with the CAN-SPAM Act.
Some e-mail marketers at the Spam and the Law Conference in San Francisco
said that the aspects of CAN-SPAM remain unclear, and that they're uneasy
about exposure to lawsuits as a result of the act. Mike Ellis, privacy
manager for Date.com, said that the law has convinced his company to
institute a strict policy on privacy and e-mail. "It makes us very
careful to dot every i and cross every t on everything we do." (Corante
01/26/04)
http://www.corante.com/policy/redir/37825.html
Top
Mediapost
reported on January 2nd:
In what might seem like a paradox to some, online offers to purchase
prescription erectile dysfunction drug Viagra ranked atop AOL's "Top 10
Spam Email Subject Lines" of 2003, but pornographic offers ranked near
the bottom of the list at No. 9. Other top-ranking spam solicitations
included offers for other prescription drugs, as well as online pharmacies
(ranked No. 2) that sell them.
Offers to reduce the size of recipients' debt ranked third, while offers to
increase the size of their anatomy (and "improve your sex life")
ranked fourth. Online degrees (5th), lower mortgage rates (6th), lower
insurance rates (7th), work-from-home (8th) and "as seen on Oprah"
(10th) rounded out the top 10 spam subject lines detected by AOL, mainly
from subscribers using its "Report Spam" button on the AOL service
Top
The typical Internet user -- far from being a geek -- shuns television and
actively socializes with friends, a study on surfing habits said Wednesday.
-
Read the whole story... (Mediapost 1/15)
Top
Overall identity theft remained the top form of consumer fraud, but Internet
related events are quickly climbing the list of top consumer complaints,
according to a fourth annual report released Thursday by the Federal Trade
Commission. Identity theft accounted for 42 percent of complaints lodged in
the FTC's Consume Sentinel database. Internet auctions accounted for 15
percent of the complaints, while Internet services and computer complaints
had a 6 percent share. (Mediapost 1/23/04)
Top
|