DO WE NEED PEOPLE ANYMORE?
As marketers we concern ourselves with publicity, direct marketing efforts,
advertising, and response rates. But how much feedback do we receive on what the buyer
experiences when he or she goes into a store to buy our products, fill out an application
for a loan, gain access to the right doctor, or work with electronic tech support?
Technology is not just changing the way we market and distribute
products, it’s changing the way customers pay for items, get interviewed
or screened. And these changes involve more than e-cash, e-mail or the web.
This month, MWT presents you with five different technological advances that
are dramatically altering how customers interact, purchase or maintain their
relationships with vendors, doctors, even parole boards. The implications
and ramifications of these technologies pose interesting new challenges for
the future.
NCRCorp. has unveiled a prototype grocery express checkout system that will allow
shoppers to scan, bag, and pay for their groceries without cashier assistance.
The company said the system has the look and feel of the familiar
automated teller machine. The user would touch selected points on the
machine’s screen to purchase groceries and even make cash withdrawals
without cashier assistance.
Joanne Walter, NCR vice president of future retailing systems, said the system will
speed checkout and also reduce the front-end costs of grocery retailers. The new system,
which allows customers to pay by cash or credit card or debit the sale to their bank
accounts, will get customers through the checkout line more quickly even when fewer
checkers are on duty.
Walker said the automated systems will allow stores to have more checkout
lanes open with fewer checkers needed, an advantage in a tough labor market.
"There is a lot of (checker) turnover and it’s hard to get
people," she added.
The system uses a sophisticated security system to keep customers honest,
said Walter. A video camera watches customers as they scan their groceries’
barcodes. If it detects the customer placing an item in the shopping bag
that wasn’t scanned, an on-screen alert will remind the customer to check
their bag for unscanned items. The system can also be set to alert store
management.
Walter said pricing has not been set for the ATM-cum-checkout system, but she predicts
retailers can get a 12-month return on investment. The system is in prototype testing and
will be generally available in early 1998.
The Bank of Montreal, one of Canada’s large national banks, has
announced that it will approve mortgage applications via the Internet,
almost instantly. Bank officials said they believe Bank of Montreal is the
first to offer mortgage approvals in an immediate, interactive session on
the World Wide Web.
The Bank of Montreal’s Mbanx electronic banking division has developed
the mortgage-application system with American Management Systems, a Fairfax,
Virginia, systems integrator. The Web site is linked to a host system that
conducts an immediate credit check and calculates the applicant’s
eligibility.
Although the system gives a near-immediate response, acceptance of a mortgage is
subject to confirmation of the information the applicant has given, said Jane Weatherbie,
vice president of Personal Lending Services at the bank. The applicant must come in person
to a Bank of Montreal branch to complete the arrangements, she said, and can choose any
branch in Canada from a list presented on the Web site.
The bank is prohibited by Canadian law from offering mortgages outside the country.
The bank’s Web site — at http://bmo.com
— also includes related features such as a mortgage calculator and a
system that asks would-be borrowers a series of questions and then
recommends a mortgage type, Weatherbie said.
Jerry Tylman, a senior principal at AMS, said the system uses standard Netscape browser
security.
Parolees won’t be able to play hand jive with their probation officers
under a new electronic reporting system installed by the New York City
Department of Probation. The system, developed by Pacer Infotec Inc.,
identifies probationers by reading their hand geometry or fingerprints
features multimedia kiosks with video touch-screens.
"The system, called CheckIn, will allow probation officers to manage large
caseloads better, and focus on rehabilitation and other important duties instead of
routine administrative tasks," according to Pacer Infotec chairman and chief
executive officer John C. Rennie.
Rennie said that under the $925,000 contract, the Probation Department will install the
CheckIn units in probation offices across the city beginning in March 1997.
The CheckIn system allows probationers or parolees to check-in electronically with
their probation officer on their reporting date. The system, already in use in three other
states, identifies probationers and then prompts them to answer a series of predetermined
questions. Rennie said the New York City system will use hand geometry as their biometric
identifier.
"The Probation Department currently supervises over 60,000 adult
probationers," Probation Department chief contracting officer Marlon Torres said.
"A minimum of 35,000 primarily low-risk probationers will report to the CheckIn
system. This will allow probation officers to focus more efficiently and effectively on
the supervision of the high-risk probationer who is prone to criminal activity," he
said.
Torres explained that under the CheckIn system, new probationers or parolees are
enrolled during a face-to-face meeting, in which their name, identification number and
other pertinent information is collected in English or Spanish, together with a photograph
and their hand geometry. This information is stored in the CheckIn database, and
subsequently, at each reporting date, probationers register at any CheckIn kiosk. Once the
electronic reporting session is complete, the system issues a receipt to the probationer.
Telemedicine is taking root across America, not only in urban medical
centers, but across the rural heartland as well. Although most programs are
still new and usage is low, as many as one-third of America’s rural
hospitals now are using telemedicine to improve patient care, according to a
study conducted for the US Office of Rural Health Policy (ORHP).
"Trends in telemedicine are being watched closely because of its immense promise
to connect the 55 million rural Americans with specialists located in distant hospitals
for diagnosis and treatment," Dr. Gary Gaumer, Abt Associates program vice president
for health and co-author of the study conducted by Abt for ORHP.
According to Gaumer, the study was a two-year inquiry that began with a nationwide
screening of rural hospitals, followed by an in-depth survey of established rural
telemedicine programs. The screening survey was mailed in the summer of 1995 to 2,365
nonfederal rural hospitals in the US. With phone follow-up, the response rate to the
survey reached 96 percent, he said.
In the study, 353 rural hospitals were identified as currently using telemedicine for
direct patient care, which named an additional 205 other telemedicine affiliates ranging
from urban medical centers to rural clinics to participate in the survey. In addition to
the surveys, the study included an in-depth examination of four rural telemedicine
networks.
Of the 499 facilities participating in rural telemedicine systems that responded to the
detailed follow-up survey, Gaumer said that 340 reported using only teleradiology, while
159 others used telemedicine, or interactive video, for many diverse clinical
applications.
Of the 159 programs that go beyond teleradiology, Gaumer said that more than 40 percent
reported using telemedicine for one year or less, while 67 percent were using their
equipment less than four times per week.
Gaumer said that most rural hospitals are using telemedicine for clinical consults,
distance education, administrative meetings and demonstrations to health professionals,
although some are offering their networks to community groups for other purposes as well,
including education and civic functions.
The survey’s results did show a downside to telemedicine, Gaumer noted,
in that equipment acquisition is costly, and connectivity and transmission
costs are high.
"These costs make telemedicine an expensive method for improving access to
care," Gaumer said. "High costs, combined with low volume in these young
programs, yields high costs per session; however, as the volume of consults increases, the
unit costs per consult will drop."
The survey also identified a number of additional barriers to telemedicine, all
involving cost. The study noted that few third-party payers cover telemedicine services,
costs are high, interactive sessions are inconvenient for busy clinicians and, outside of
radiology, there are no standards for acceptable telemedicine practices.
"Cost is a big contributor to a perception that telemedicine may not be a
cost-effective way to improves access," Andrea Hassol, senior researcher at Abt and
co-author of the study, said. "The challenge for these programs is to communicate
effectively the value of telemedicine and convince clinicians, both specialists and rural
practitioners, to participate."
The report is on the Web at http://www.hrsa.dhhs.gov/news.html
Island Data Corp, a privately held company, revealed results from an
informal survey of 56 high-tech companies’ electronic technical support.
Results found tech support from well-known companies through electronic mail
and the World Wide Web to be "pathetic."
Island Data Corp. offers automated technical support service and serves
as third party contractor handling electronic support for a number of
computer industry companies. Major players on Island Data’s list included
Apple Computer, Borland, IBM, AST, Delrina, Conner, Novell, 3COM and others.
Company president, Guy Jones, spoke about the results of his study. "We randomly
chose 56 high-tech companies to determine whether they offered electronic technical
support," he began. "This was really an informal study to help us determine the
nature of technical support through e-mail. What we found shocked us."
Out of the 56 companies listed only 35 offered electronic tech support. Island Data
sent each of the 35 companies simple basic tech support questions related to specific
products. Only three companies, Adobe, Micropolis, and Mindscape responded on the same
day. Their responses were automated and stated a more direct response would be
forthcoming.
By the end of one week, only 30.4 percent had made any kind of response outside the
three previously mentioned. In summary, Island Data said, "Electronic support in this
test group is pathetic. Almost 70% of companies in the group did not respond within one
week. Less than 6% of companies responded within one day."
According to Island Data, previous studies have shown that customers expect to receive
a response to an electronic request within one day. Clearly, this expectation is not being
met. The companies that have invested in auto-response and advanced electronic support are
doing it very well. The same companies that provided auto-response services also followed
up with a real answer the same day and customers reach an online support rep faster.
More information is available at http://www.islanddata.com.
(Contacts: Connie Olasz, NCR, 770-623-7340, e-mail to connie.olasz@atlanaga.ncr.com and Marnie
Gordon at 770-431-6207; Jane Weatherbie, Bank of Montreal, 416-927-5771; Pauline Weger,
American Management Systems, 703-267-5053, e-mail pauline_weger@mail.amsinc.com; Larry
Kerpelman, Abt Associates Inc., 617-349-2713; e-mail larry_kerpelman@abtassoc.com; Paul
Serotkin, Pacer Infotec, 508-667-8800; Rob Edenzen, Island Data, tel 619-487-9335)
Top